Examiner-focused
Start with recurring operational friction rather than a feature list looking for a problem.
About ByteCase
ByteCase supports documentation, verification, validation, examiner-authored records, presentation, and workflow visibility around the forensic platforms examiners already use.
Why it exists
Forensic work can be technically sound while the supporting record remains fragmented. Requests may arrive through email. Acquisition details may be split across handwritten notes, screenshots, report fragments, and tool logs. Hash values may be displayed once and never preserved in a form that can be reopened later.
When a case returns months later, the examiner may need to reconstruct work that was already completed. ByteCase is being built to reduce that reconstruction.
Product principles
Start with recurring operational friction rather than a feature list looking for a problem.
Create records that help explain what happened, when it happened, and what remains with the case.
A common task should not require rebuilding the form, folder, checklist, or report structure every time.
Important records should remain visible and useful outside an opaque application database.
Each tool should provide value independently before integration adds another layer of complexity.
Software can structure the work without replacing examiner judgment, policy, validation, or legal review.
The suite
Case workflow
Standalone laboratory tools
Built by Forensics Byte
ByteCase was created by Matt McBride, a digital forensics and public-safety technology professional whose work spans evidence acquisition, forensic workflow support, integrity verification, cybersecurity, policy, technology administration, and practical software development.
Meet the creator →Built in public
Repetitive documentation work, missing request information, difficult handoffs, validation gaps, and case records that are hard to reconstruct are all useful signals.